Category
5 articles
Thirty years of lectures, read as a single document, do not read like nostalgia. They read like an early-warning system — and much of what was warned about has now arrived in statute, in procurement and in practice.
The Oxford Amnesty Lectures archive is not a museum piece. As the 2026 protest policing bill returns to public attention, its arguments about assembly, state power and accountability offer a practical rights test — and a warning about vague laws, pre-emptive control and surveillance.
Planning reform is being sold as a choice between homes and delay. It is also a test of participatory rights, access to information, and the right to challenge decisions. The 2026 Planning Bill needs a human-rights audit before it reshapes local democracy.
Automated decision-making is being rolled out across benefits, policing and immigration under the language of efficiency and innovation. Drawing on Amnesty’s digital-rights lectures, this analysis sets out practical human-rights tests for 2026 and explains how readers can intervene in local consultations.
The Oxford Amnesty Lectures archive is often treated as heritage. It is better understood as a toolbox: a record of arguments about assembly, disobedience and state power that speaks directly to the UK’s protest battles in 2026.